REGARDING BUILDING AN OFF GRID COMMUNITY: I see a lot of folks very excited about the “tiny house village” post and they want to build something like that for their own family and friends.

So, I created a basic plan for an off grid community. 🙂 👍✌🌲

I’ve been in this “off grid” niche for 15 years. In that time I’ve researched every aspect of off grid living known to man and then some. I’ve also talked to hundreds of zoning and planning offices and counties and officials throughout the USA over the years about off grid living and build cabins, homes, buying and chopping up land into smaller parcels, building, permitting, and land use regulations. Basically I’m saying that I’ve “looked it up” and I’ve “done a lot of the research” for you already so you don’t have as much work to do. You’ll still need to read you local laws though. You can’t avoid that.

If you want to create an off grid community

then read this article about it that will give you some ideas on how to do it legally and without jumping through a bunch of hoops. 

One problem is that most folks just don’t know where to start.

A lot of folks also don’t do their research or due diligence by calling and talking with the zoning and planning office of the county they’re moving into to find out what the land use regulations are and if they would allow an off grid community or type of off grid living they want to do.

Most people also don’t know the right questions to ask the zoning office and because of that they don’t know to ask certain things that would make their lives much easier. They don’t know how the process works. Folks will take the zoning and planning office worker’s advice at face value because it’s all they have to go by. This is not how you should do it if you want to build an off grid community or build a non-traditional home off grid. For this post I’ll focus on community since folks love the idea. 

When selling this idea of an “off grid community” to the zoning and planning office you don’t mention an off grid community unless you know that they know what you mean. Gather information first. Ask questions. Don’t just go into it by TELLING them that you want to build a community.

Your first step should be to read the county zoning and land use regulations for the county/area you’re thinking of buying land. DON’T BUY LAND WITHOUT READING THE ZONING LAWS! Too many people get excited and buy a parcel of land because it’s cheap or they fell in love with it, or it looks “perfect”. This is how you can set yourself up for a legal and expensive nightmare if you don’t take your time and do your due diligence. Never buy land sight unseen. Always walk the property. Talk to neighbors in the area. If you see someone out and about near your property and it safe, stop and talk to them, introduce yourself, tell them you’re considering  moving to the area and you’d like to know about the community there. Read the zoning laws. Read the covenants and restrictions (if any) on the parcel you’re buying. (Pro Tip: If there are covenants and restrictions [CC&Rs] then you’re too late. That means someone already subdivided the land and you’re buying a LOT in a rural residential subdivision. The problem with this is that the people that form these subdivisions (99% of the time) form the subdivision and write the CC&Rs with traditional homes in mind. Not for off grid living. This can pose a problem when you want to build a non-traditional log cabin or tiny house, or live in your RV or camper trailer while you build your cabin. And you can forget about building an off grid community inside a single rural residential lot/parcel that’s inside a rural subdivision. That’s not going to happen. Oh, and if it’s inside the city limits forget about it. There’s no way you’ll get approval for an off grid community inside city limits. Move on!

Don’t mention “off grid community” until you’re sure you want to build there. Don’t waste your time or theirs.

Because the moment you mention an off grid community they’ll want you to setup a “SUBDIVISION” with the county. (which is more complex and could be more expensive). 

They do this because it’s the legal structure they understand the most with regard to a “community”. You need to realize that the people working in the zoning office and tax assessors office and county clerk’s office are all required by law to follow the law to the T while working and they have specific legal structures they are trained on and knowledgeable about. In too many cases I’ve found when talking to them about building an off grid community that they either don’t know what that is or they immediately start thinking in terms of subdivisions. It’s NOT a subdivision. 

A subdivision is a legal term used to describe a traditional suburban or rural neighborhood. You’re not building a neighborhood. You’re not a “developer”. Developers build subdivisions. Not off gridders.

If you go in there talking about building an “off grid community” not only do they most likely not know what that is, there is no precedent or provision or legal structure in their permitting and licensing and zoning and land use for an “off grid community”.

They think and act and issue permits and tax property in terms of parcels, lots, single family homes, mobile homes, manufactured homes, city residential, rural residential zoning and minimum lot sizes, minimum square footage, easements, septic, water hookups, utilities, and legal terms like “subdivision”, etc.

The moment you start to say “I want to build an off grid community for my family and friends.” they immediately think of a subdivision and start you down that path and it’s hard to get them back on the right track because that’s what they’re familiar with and they may not understand what you mean by “off grid community” which is NOT a traditional subdivision because the water, power, and septic are all different. And THAT could be a problem.

Is it a subdivision? Let me tell you something about a subdivision and how it works. There’s a bunch of legal hoops you have to jump through, and bureaucratic red tape you’re going to have to navigate through to set up a legal subdivision. There are a lot of community related hurdles when you’re talking about building a subdivision and the fees and costs and regulations are much more complex.

More complex than what?

Well, there are a lot of different types of legal entities and structures and terms the county is familiar with. There’s more than one way to do things.

To create a unified off-grid community while preserving the integrity and shared purpose of the group, there are several legal structures that could work:

1. Land Trust (For-Profit or Non-Profit)

• Structure: The community could form a for-profit or non-profit land trust that holds the entire parcel of land. Community members could lease the rights to live on the land, build structures, and use community resources without owning individual lots.
• Advantages: This would prevent subdivision and ensure that no individual could claim private ownership or build fences that would disrupt the community. The land trust would also ensure that the land remains in communal use.
• Approach: Present this as a sustainable, long-term investment to the county. Highlight environmental and community benefits, especially in areas where sustainable projects are encouraged.

2. Cooperative (Co-op)

• Structure: A cooperative model would involve community members collectively owning the entire parcel. Each member would have a share in the co-op, rather than individual ownership of specific sections. Decisions about land use and development would be made collectively.
• Advantages: Like the land trust, the cooperative model prevents individuals from claiming private parcels while giving each member a stake in the community. You could set clear rules about communal responsibilities.
• Approach: When approaching counties, emphasize the democratic nature of a co-op and how this will ensure responsible land management and community cohesion.

3. Conservation Easement

• Structure: A conservation easement is an agreement to preserve the land’s natural state while still allowing certain types of development, like building tiny homes. The easement could be managed by a land trust or co-op.
• Advantages: This option could make the project more appealing to counties concerned about environmental impact. It would also reinforce the community’s commitment to sustainability and conservation.
• Approach: Counties that prioritize green development might be more receptive to a conservation easement plan.

4. Planned Unit Development (PUD)

• Structure: A PUD allows you to develop land in a flexible way that doesn’t conform strictly to zoning regulations. You could plan the community as a single development with shared resources, minimizing individual ownership while creating a cohesive legal structure.
• Advantages: Counties may already have processes in place for PUDs, which could make it easier to navigate local regulations. You could also negotiate with counties to establish off-grid utilities and renewable energy as part of the PUD’s design.
• Approach: Work with county planners to ensure the PUD design meets local building and environmental codes while retaining the community vision.

Key Considerations:

• Zoning Laws: Research zoning regulations in the rural counties you’re considering. Some counties may be more flexible about sustainable communities, while others may have restrictions on shared ownership or off-grid development.
• Community Agreements: Regardless of the legal structure, establishing clear rules through bylaws or community agreements will help prevent conflicts later on. These should include guidelines for dwellings, resource use, and community contributions.
• Water Rights: Be sure to address how water will be sourced and managed, as water rights can be a critical issue, especially in rural areas.

When approaching rural counties, emphasize the long-term environmental and social benefits of your off-grid community. Present data on sustainability, potential contributions to local economies, and how the community aligns with the county’s long-term development plans.

***********

A land trust and a co-op (cooperative) are two different legal structures used for managing land and property, each with its own pros and cons depending on your goals for community ownership and management. Here’s a comparison of the two:

Land Trust

A land trust is a legal arrangement in which a piece of land is owned and managed by an organization (for-profit or non-profit), with the intent of preserving, conserving, or using it in a specific way. The trust holds legal ownership of the land, and community members can lease or otherwise use the land but do not own it directly.

Pros:

1. Centralized Ownership: The land trust owns the entire parcel of land, preventing fragmentation and ensuring unified control over how the land is used. This aligns well with your goal of maintaining a cohesive off-grid community.
2. Long-Term Protection: Land trusts often come with restrictions that prevent the land from being sold or developed in ways that go against the community’s long-term vision, ensuring sustainability and continuity.
3. Flexibility in Management: The trust can set rules and regulations for land use, giving it flexibility in managing the community while ensuring the land is used for its intended purpose (e.g., sustainability, conservation, communal living).
4. Tax Benefits (Non-Profit Trust): If the trust is non-profit, there may be tax exemptions or incentives for the organization, which can reduce costs. Some counties or states may also provide tax incentives for land preservation.
5. Easier to Prevent Sell-Offs: Since individuals don’t own the land directly, it’s easier to prevent members from selling off portions, ensuring the community stays united.

Cons:

1. Limited Individual Ownership: Community members do not own the land or their dwellings outright; they may have leases or other usage rights. This can be less appealing for people who want ownership of their home and land.
2. Complex Management Structure: Managing a land trust can be complex, particularly if the trust is large. Decision-making can become centralized, which may lead to disagreements over land use or management.
3. Restrictions on Land Use: Depending on the nature of the trust, there may be legal or operational restrictions that limit how the land can be used or developed, which may limit future flexibility.

Co-op (Cooperative)

A cooperative is a legal structure where the land and assets are owned collectively by the members. Each member owns a share of the cooperative, which gives them the right to use the land and participate in the management of the community.

Pros:

1. Collective Ownership: All members own the land collectively through the co-op. This sense of shared ownership can foster a stronger sense of community and participation.
2. Democratic Decision-Making: Co-ops usually operate on a democratic model, where each member has a vote in decisions about how the land is managed. This ensures that all members have a say in the community’s direction.
3. Shared Resources: The co-op model can make it easier to share resources like renewable energy infrastructure, water systems, and communal buildings, because all members have an ownership stake in those resources.
4. Flexibility in Ownership: Co-ops can be structured in different ways, such as giving members the right to own or rent their homes while still collectively managing the land. This flexibility can appeal to a wider range of people.
5. Equity in Membership: Since the co-op owns the land, any increase in property value or community assets benefits all members equally, rather than individuals profiting from ownership of separate parcels.

Cons:

1. Complex Decision-Making: While democratic, decision-making in a co-op can become slow or challenging if members have conflicting views. Reaching consensus on important issues might take time, and disagreements can affect community harmony.
2. Risk of Sell-Offs: Unlike a land trust, co-op members technically own shares in the co-op, and they may be able to sell their shares or transfer ownership. If not carefully regulated, this could lead to ownership changes that don’t align with the community’s vision.
3. Financing Challenges: Co-ops may have a harder time obtaining loans or financing, especially if the structure is non-traditional. Individual members may also find it challenging to secure mortgages if they don’t own the land directly.
4. Legal Complexity: Co-ops can have complex legal and tax structures, and they may be subject to additional state regulations depending on where they are located. This can make setting up and maintaining the co-op more complicated.

Comparison

Aspect	Land Trust	Co-op
Ownership	Land is owned by the trust; members have usage rights	Land and assets are collectively owned by the members
Decision-Making	Centralized, often managed by a board or trustees	Democratic, each member has a vote
Individual Ownership	No individual ownership of land	Members own shares, which grant them rights to use the land
Community Unity	Strong control over land use, easy to maintain unity	Unity depends on member cooperation and adherence to co-op rules
Sell-Off Risk	Low risk (land cannot be sold without breaking the trust)	Higher risk if members sell their shares without restrictions
Flexibility	Can be restrictive, depends on the trust agreement	More flexible in terms of management and individual rights
Legal Complexity	May require detailed legal structuring and management	Can be legally complex and subject to different state regulations
Financing	Easier to get financing for land improvements	Harder to get traditional loans or financing, especially for members

Which is Better for Your Off-Grid Community?

• If community cohesion and long-term land protection are your priorities, a land trust might be better because it gives centralized control and prevents sell-offs or fragmentation.
• If you want more member ownership and democratic management, a co-op could be the right choice, but you’ll need to ensure mechanisms are in place to prevent ownership changes that could disrupt the community’s vision.

Ultimately, it depends on your goals for ownership, decision-making, and long-term management of the community.

************************

it is possible to create a hybrid structure that combines elements of both a land trust and a co-op. While they are different legal entities, they can be used together in a complementary way to balance the benefits of both models. This hybrid approach can offer flexibility in how you structure ownership, governance, and management for your off-grid community.

How a Hybrid Model Could Work:

1. Land Trust Owns the Land:
   • The land trust would hold the legal title to the entire parcel of land. This ensures that the land is preserved and protected from being subdivided or sold off piecemeal, maintaining the unified community structure.
   • The land trust could place restrictions or easements on the property to ensure that it is used for the community’s long-term vision (e.g., sustainable living, renewable energy use, etc.).
   • The trust would ensure that the land remains dedicated to the community’s purpose, while the co-op manages the day-to-day operations and decision-making.
2. Co-op Manages the Community:
   • The cooperative would manage the community, including the homes, communal infrastructure, and resources. Members of the co-op could own membership units or shares, which entitle them to live on the land, participate in decision-making, and contribute to the community.
   • The co-op could handle democratic decision-making, allowing each member a vote on how the community is run (e.g., how resources are shared, what new developments are allowed, etc.).
   • The co-op would also manage the financial aspects, such as collecting fees or rent from members for maintenance, utilities, and shared resources.

Benefits of a Hybrid Approach:

1. Long-Term Land Protection:
   • By having the land owned by a trust, you ensure that it is protected from being broken up or developed in ways that go against the community’s mission.
   • The land trust could include legal mechanisms to prevent individual members from claiming private ownership over any part of the land.
2. Democratic Decision-Making:
   • The co-op structure allows for a democratic process where community members can vote on how the community is managed, ensuring that everyone has a say in decisions about resource use, infrastructure, and communal activities.
3. Flexible Living Arrangements:
   • Community members can hold shares in the co-op, which would give them the right to use a dwelling or part of the land, but they wouldn’t own the land directly. This prevents fragmentation while still allowing a sense of ownership and participation.
4. Prevent Sell-Offs and Conflicts:
   • The land trust ensures that no individual member can sell their part of the land or build fences, helping to maintain the sense of community. However, members can still have individual rights through their co-op membership shares.
   • The co-op can also set rules for how shares or memberships are transferred, preventing unwanted changes in ownership that might disrupt the community.
5. Sustainable Management:
   • The hybrid model allows for sustainable resource management through the co-op while the land trust ensures the long-term preservation of the land’s environmental goals.

Challenges of a Hybrid Model:

1. Legal Complexity:
   • Combining a land trust and a co-op will involve navigating two different legal frameworks, which may require careful legal structuring. You’ll need to establish clear agreements that outline how the trust and the co-op interact, how decisions are made, and how conflicts are resolved.
2. Clear Governance:
   • Governance structures must be clearly defined to avoid confusion between the roles of the land trust and the co-op. The trust would control the land, but the co-op would manage the day-to-day affairs, so there needs to be clarity about how much authority each entity has.
3. Financing and Tax Implications:
   • Depending on whether the land trust is for-profit or non-profit, there could be different tax and financing implications. Non-profit trusts may get tax benefits, but for-profit trusts might offer more flexibility in managing the property.

How to Implement a Hybrid Model:

1. Create a Land Trust:
   • Establish a land trust to hold the legal title to the land. Draft the trust agreement to include specific goals (sustainability, community preservation) and any restrictions on how the land can be used or sold.
2. Form the Co-op:
   • Create a cooperative that will manage the community’s operations. The co-op will handle things like housing, communal resource management, and the democratic decision-making process for the members.
3. Define the Relationship:
   • Draft a legal agreement between the land trust and the co-op, outlining how they will work together. The agreement should cover:
     • The rights and responsibilities of each entity.
     • How the co-op members will use the land (e.g., long-term leases or licenses).
     • How decisions about the land will be made (e.g., the co-op may make decisions about dwellings and infrastructure, while the trust retains veto power over major changes).
     • Transferability of membership and how shares are handled.
4. Set Rules for Community Membership:
   • Establish rules that prevent individual members from making decisions that could harm the community (e.g., building fences or trying to sell off part of the land). These rules could be enforced by both the land trust (through restrictions) and the co-op (through its democratic governance).

By combining a land trust with a co-op, you can protect the land while allowing for shared ownership and management within the community. This hybrid model provides a way to balance the long-term preservation of the land with the flexible, democratic management that a co-op offers.

**************

Creating an off-grid community using a hybrid model that blends for-profit and non-profit structures presents unique opportunities and challenges. Each model has distinct advantages and drawbacks depending on the community’s goals, funding mechanisms, and long-term vision. Here’s a breakdown of the non-profit vs. for-profit hybrid models, along with a comparison of the two.

Non-Profit Hybrid Model

In a non-profit hybrid model, the community is primarily structured as a non-profit entity. This could be a non-profit land trust that owns the land, with the goal of preserving the land for community purposes, sustainability, and long-term environmental protection. The community itself could be operated by a co-op or another member-managed organization within the non-profit framework.

Pros:

1. Tax Exemptions:
   • Non-profit organizations are eligible for various tax benefits, including federal and state tax exemptions, which can reduce operational costs.
2. Grant and Donation Eligibility:
   • As a non-profit, the community may qualify for grants, donations, and other funding sources designed for environmental sustainability, conservation, and community building. This opens up significant opportunities for securing funding for renewable energy, infrastructure, and educational programs.
3. Land Conservation:
   • The non-profit structure ensures that the land is held in trust for community purposes, helping prevent future development or sale for profit. This aligns with long-term sustainability goals and helps protect the community’s vision.
4. Mission-Driven Focus:
   • A non-profit structure reinforces a commitment to shared values, such as sustainability, environmental protection, and community well-being. Decisions are made to support the mission rather than generate profits.
5. Community Building:
   • A non-profit structure often fosters stronger community involvement, as the focus is on collaboration and common good rather than profit generation.

Cons:

1. Limited Income-Generating Potential:
   • Non-profits are restricted in their ability to distribute profits. Any surplus income must be reinvested into the organization, limiting opportunities for members to personally profit from the community.
2. Complexity in Securing Capital:
   • It can be challenging to secure loans or investments for non-profits, as there is no opportunity for financial return to investors. This can limit the availability of funding for large projects.
3. Strict Regulations and Oversight:
   • Non-profit organizations are subject to more stringent government oversight and reporting requirements. There are strict rules about how funds are used and how decisions are made, which can add to administrative complexity.
4. Limited Flexibility:
   • Non-profits must operate within the boundaries of their stated mission and legal requirements, which can reduce flexibility in responding to market opportunities or changing community needs.

For-Profit Hybrid Model

In a for-profit hybrid model, the community could be structured as a for-profit LLC or corporation. The land might be owned by the for-profit entity, while other aspects, such as the co-op or community services, could operate as separate entities (either for-profit or non-profit). The for-profit model allows for the generation of revenue through various activities like selling community memberships, leasing homes, offering services, or even ecotourism.

Pros:

1. Profit Distribution:
   • A for-profit structure allows community members or investors to receive profits from the land or other community-based businesses. This makes it easier to attract private investors or community members who want to see financial returns.
2. Flexibility in Operations:
   • For-profit entities have fewer restrictions on how they operate. This allows for more flexibility in pursuing revenue-generating activities like eco-tourism, sustainable farming, or other entrepreneurial ventures within the community.
3. Easier Access to Capital:
   • For-profit businesses can more easily secure loans or investments because they can offer a return on investment. This is particularly helpful if you need funding for infrastructure, renewable energy projects, or expansion.
4. Motivating Ownership Model:
   • In a for-profit model, members may feel a stronger sense of ownership and motivation to contribute because they can benefit financially from the community’s success.

Cons:

1. Focus on Profit:
   • The primary challenge with a for-profit model is that it can sometimes shift the focus from community well-being to profit generation. This might lead to decisions that favor short-term financial gains over long-term sustainability or communal goals.
2. Potential for Fragmentation:
   • If community members are primarily motivated by financial returns, there is a risk of fragmentation as some members may prioritize their own profits over the good of the community, which could undermine the sense of unity.
3. Tax Obligations:
   • For-profit entities must pay taxes on income, property, and other assets, which can increase operational costs compared to a tax-exempt non-profit structure.
4. Investor Pressure:
   • Investors or members seeking financial returns may put pressure on the community to commercialize or pursue ventures that don’t align with the community’s original vision or values.

Comparison of Non-Profit vs. For-Profit Hybrid Models

Aspect	Non-Profit Hybrid Model	For-Profit Hybrid Model
Primary Goal	Mission-driven, focused on sustainability and community	Profit-driven, focused on generating revenue and returns
Ownership Structure	Land owned by a non-profit land trust, managed collectively	Land owned by for-profit entity, shares/membership for profit
Tax Benefits	Eligible for tax exemptions and grants	Subject to regular taxation, no special tax benefits
Funding Sources	Can access donations, grants, and government funds	Easier to secure private investment or loans
Profit Sharing	No profit sharing; surplus reinvested into the community	Allows for profit sharing among members or investors
Flexibility	Limited flexibility; must operate according to mission	More flexibility; can pursue diverse business activities
Attracting Members	Appeals to those motivated by mission and sustainability	Appeals to those seeking financial returns alongside sustainability
Governance	Governed by non-profit rules, often with board oversight	Governed by owners, investors, or members seeking profit
Long-Term Land Use	Ensures land preservation and protection	May prioritize land use for financial gain
Administrative Burden	Higher due to compliance with non-profit regulations	Lower, but tax reporting and profit management required
Risk of Sell-Offs	Low risk, as the non-profit controls the land	Higher risk if members or investors seek to sell or develop land

Which Hybrid Model is Best for Your Community?

• Non-Profit Hybrid Model is better if your primary focus is on community-building, long-term sustainability, and environmental protection. The tax benefits and access to grants can also make it easier to fund renewable energy projects and infrastructure. This model works well if your community’s goal is to preserve the land and maintain a strong sense of unity and shared mission.
• For-Profit Hybrid Model is ideal if you want to generate revenue, attract investors, or create a community with a strong entrepreneurial focus. If your community plans to pursue business ventures (such as ecotourism or sustainable farming) or attract members interested in financial returns, the for-profit model allows for more flexibility and easier access to capital.

Hybrid of Both?

You could also consider a hybrid approach that integrates both nonprofit and for-profit elements:

• The land trust could be a non-profit entity that owns the land and ensures its long-term protection.
• A for-profit co-op or LLC could operate the community, allowing for profit-sharing from revenue-generating activities while preserving the land for communal use.

This hybrid approach would allow you to balance financial sustainability with community preservation and long-term environmental goals.

*************************

For your hybrid community model, structuring a strong contract agreement between the non-profit land trust and the for-profit co-op is essential to maintain both the preservation of the land and the financial opportunities for members and investors. Here are some key elements to consider for this structure:

1. Contract Agreement Between Non-Profit Land Trust and For-Profit Co-op

• Purpose of the Agreement: Define the roles of both entities clearly. The non-profit land trust will own and protect the land, while the for-profit co-op will manage community operations and revenue-generating activities.
• Land Use and Restrictions: The land trust should outline any land use restrictions (e.g., no subdivision, sustainable building practices, no commercial development that harms the environment). The co-op will agree to operate within these guidelines.
• Lease or License Agreement: The co-op would lease or license the land from the land trust. This lease would cover the use of the land for housing, community infrastructure, and any revenue-generating activities. The lease could have long-term renewal provisions to ensure stability.
• Revenue Sharing: Include clauses specifying how profits from co-op ventures (e.g., eco-tourism, sustainable agriculture, or product sales) will be distributed to members. Specify that profits are shared equally among members to maintain fairness and cohesion.
• Management of Common Resources: Define how the co-op will manage shared resources such as water, energy (solar, wind), and community infrastructure (roads, communal buildings, etc.), in line with sustainability principles.

2. Dispute Resolution and Conflict Management

• Dispute Resolution Framework: The agreement should include a clear process for resolving disputes between the land trust and the co-op. This could involve:
  • Mediation: A neutral third party could mediate disputes before escalating to more formal legal action.
  • Arbitration: If mediation fails, arbitration could be used to resolve conflicts without involving the court system, which can be more time-efficient.
  • Legal Recourse: If arbitration does not lead to resolution, legal recourse could be the final step.
• Community Dispute Mechanisms: Establish a community-based conflict resolution system for member-to-member disputes or co-op management issues. This could involve a democratically elected conflict resolution committee or involve the wider membership in major decisions.

3. For-Profit Opportunities for Members and Investors

• Profit Sharing: Ensure that the co-op’s profits are distributed equally among the members. Every member should own a share of the co-op, and profits can be distributed based on the number of shares or as flat equal payments.
• Investment Opportunities: For-profit opportunities could include attracting outside investors, but you should establish limits on how much control or influence investors have over the community to maintain the shared vision. Consider offering investors non-voting shares to protect community decision-making.
• Revenue Streams:
  • Eco-Tourism: Members could create revenue by offering sustainable travel experiences like off-grid cabin rentals, educational workshops, or guided nature tours.
  • Sustainable Farming: Members could grow food and sell surplus produce to local markets or engage in farming co-ops.
  • Product Creation: Community members could make and sell products like off-grid technologies, crafts, or other sustainable goods, with profits feeding back into the co-op.

4. Governance and Participation

• Democratic Governance: The for-profit co-op should operate on a one member, one vote basis, ensuring that everyone has an equal say in decision-making, regardless of their financial contributions. This protects the community’s democratic nature.
• Board of Directors: Both the non-profit land trust and for-profit co-op could have their own boards, with some overlap between the two to ensure coordination. For example, members of the co-op’s board could serve on an advisory board for the land trust.
• Shared Leadership: Implement rotating leadership roles or committees that allow for broader participation in decision-making and help prevent power from concentrating in the hands of a few members.

5. Ensuring Long-Term Sustainability

• Sustainability Clause: Both entities should have clear mandates to operate sustainably and in harmony with environmental goals. The co-op can create sustainability goals (e.g., energy independence, waste reduction), while the land trust ensures land use aligns with these goals.
• Exit Strategy: If members or investors want to leave, ensure there are buy-back provisions or first-refusal rights for the co-op to repurchase shares or membership units. This prevents outside buyers from gaining control of the community.

Hybrid Model Benefits:

Pros:

• Preserves Land Integrity: The non-profit land trust ensures that the land is preserved for community purposes and cannot be sold or developed in ways that go against the community’s mission.
• Offers Profit Opportunities: The for-profit co-op allows members and investors to share in the profits generated by community ventures while preserving a fair, democratic structure.
• Balances Financial and Community Goals: The structure lets you attract investors for projects while maintaining community values and protecting long-term land use.
• Dispute Mechanism: By having a built-in dispute resolution process, both the land trust and co-op can maintain a productive relationship, preventing disputes from escalating.

Cons:

• Legal Complexity: Combining non-profit and for-profit entities can be legally complex, and you may need specialized legal and financial advice to set up and manage both entities successfully.
• Potential for Investor-Community Conflict: If not carefully managed, the for-profit aspect could attract investors whose goals might not align with the community’s values. Protecting the community’s integrity requires a strong governance structure.
• Administrative Burden: Managing both a non-profit and for-profit entity, especially with overlapping governance structures, can create additional administrative work.

By ensuring a well-defined contract agreement, clear governance, and balanced opportunities for profit sharing, this hybrid model could effectively support the creation of your off-grid community. It aligns both long-term sustainability with financial opportunities, keeping your vision intact while allowing for growth and member involvement.

**************************

There are a lot of moving parts to this giant project, but with a good solid plan and clear agreements, bylaws, contracts, and legal structure in place, community members can have a great future living off-grid in a sustainable community of like-minded individuals with sustainable income, profit-share, as well as preservation of the land and their financial future with ownership. Having a first refusal rights clause in the membership agreement protects the community from outside investors infiltrating, corrupting, and trying to take over the community because the land trust has veto power and buyback authority.

A hybrid community like this addresses many of the common pitfalls that traditional subdivisions face. In most conventional land development models, subdividing land leads to fragmented ownership, often resulting in disunity as individual property owners prioritize their own goals over the community’s shared vision. By creating a hybrid model that combines a non-profit land trust to protect and preserve the land with a for-profit co-op that generates sustainable income, you can ensure that the community remains united in both its mission and its financial goals. The land trust serves as the legal guardian of the property, ensuring that the community’s long-term goals—whether they are environmental, social, or economic—are protected. Meanwhile, the for-profit co-op offers members the opportunity to invest in the community, share in its profits, and benefit from a range of income streams.

The hybrid approach also provides a built-in funding mechanism. Rather than relying solely on traditional property sales, which often break apart the community, this model generates ongoing residual income from multiple sources. By diversifying revenue streams, the community can offer rentals, sell products and services, host workshops, produce literature, promote arts and crafts, and engage in ecotourism activities. This not only makes the community financially viable but also provides members with a meaningful and sustainable livelihood. It ensures that the community doesn’t become overly reliant on any one form of income, allowing for adaptability and resilience in the face of economic changes.

If the property is large enough, you can create an expansive, engaging environment filled with outdoor activities and recreational opportunities that enrich the lives of community members. With parks, green spaces, playgrounds for children, lakes or ponds, and areas for camping, hiking, and biking, the community becomes a vibrant and active hub. Adding conveyance options like bicycles, golf carts, or even electric-powered transportation could enhance the off-grid experience and ensure easy movement within the property. Moreover, proximity to public lands such as national forests or state parks would open the door to endless opportunities for nature walks, outdoor education, and camping, reinforcing the community’s deep connection with nature.

What makes this model even more compelling is its balance of financial sustainability and community well-being. With the inclusion of the first refusal rights clause, you are protecting the integrity of the community from outside interests. This clause ensures that any member wishing to leave or sell their stake must offer it first to the community, empowering the land trust with veto power and the ability to buy back membership shares before any external party can intervene. This mechanism serves as a shield against external investors who might want to change the community’s focus or compromise its core principles. It creates a self-sustaining cycle where the community continuously reinvests in itself and its members, preserving its unity and mission over time.

The recreational opportunities within the property and the strong internal governance model, combined with the financial benefits of the hybrid model, create an ecosystem where the community thrives. The hybrid land trust/co-op model, coupled with both non-profit and for-profit elements, provides an ideal framework for building a family-friendly and financially sustainable community. Members can enjoy the benefits of a peaceful, off-grid lifestyle while securing their financial futures through shared profits and ownership. This structure promotes investment potential, sustainability, and long-term growth without compromising the community’s core values or its environmental impact.

The hybrid land trust/co-op model combined with the non-profit and for-profit models, and the membership profit share in the entire community, creates a vibrant, rich community with everything everyone would ever need to live a happy life and live their off-grid dream.